Wednesday, June 08, 2005

Nielsen and search interfaces

At a conference in Denmark, Spring 2000, he mentioned his work in the Googles advisory board. As I remenber it, Nielsen was referring to some of the conclusions and his own involvement in the design of the userinterface of Google.

Realities of Affiliate Marketing and PPC
What is PPC?
Adding images web hosting
automotive repairs machine tools lifts direct shop wholesale
Backgrounds images web pages

A look back: SE's as Altavista where in the late 90's very clean and simple. Then came all the portals with - sometimes - 100 or more links at the front. Yahoo was one of them. I'm sure Google asked Nielsen, as a usability-guru what to do. The result was a "back to basic"-strategy.

Bankrupcy/Bankrupcies
html codes/tags complete list
More drinking water charts
More Funeral Programs
Etiquette Private services Funeral Programs

The reason why Altavista never got succes, was because of an unclever backend-engine and offen useless page 1 SERP's - not a design-problem.

The formula of the Google-succes was a combination of relevant results and a simple design that usually never confused the users.

Character codes HTML ASCII foreign
myspace backgrounds layouts html codes ip address
Private Financial Aid programs
More on using CGI proxy
web design layouts tips

Of course msn and yahoo have learned their lesson. And today the Google userinterface looks to be a standard for SE's. Well, Google are the leader - of course the others do what the leader is doing (and hopefully, some other things).

To us, this doesn't means, that all search buttoms/fields in the world have to look exactly the same way. It's both a typical "Nielsen-conclusion/recommadation" and a typical "Nielsen-way-thinking".

Good credit scores numbers
GRML Bar Graphs
GRML Headlines
GRML Pioneer
GRML Tree

We do have to listen to the guidelines. Then we all have to do our homework: Test it on our sites and take a look a the conversion-rate and the way user act on our sites. That's what really matters.